OKLAHOMA CITY – State Rep. Mike Sanders said today that local fire departments will receive operational grants through the Oklahoma Department of Agriculture, Food and Forestry.
“Rural lawmakers know how important the fire service is to our communities that rely on it for public safety and property protection,” said Sanders, R-Kingfisher. “Although I was disappointed that money going to fire departments was reduced this year, I am glad that there were still substantial grants.”
The Oklahoma Department of Agriculture awarded $4289.96 in grants to the following House District 59 entities:
- Town of Dover for Dover Rural Fire Department
- Town of Hennessey for Hennessey Fire Department
- Town of Loyal for the Loyal Fire Department
- Town of Okarche for Okarche Fire Department
- Big Four Fire Association
- City of Kingfisher for Kingfisher Fire Department
- City of Watonga for Watonga Fire Department
- Town of Canton for Canton Fire Department
- Town of Greenfield for Greenfield Fire Department
- Town of Hitchcock for Hitchcock Fire Department
- Town of Longdale for Longdale Fire Department
- Town of Okeene for Okeene Fire Department
- Town of Omega for Omega Fire Department
- Eagle City Rural Fire District
- City of Seiling for Seiling Fire Department
- Oakwood Volunteer Fire Department Inc.
- Taloga Fire and Ambulance
- Town of Camargo for Camargo Fire Department
- Town of Leedey for Leedey Fire Department
- Town of Mutual for Mutual Fire Department
- Town of Sharon for Sharon Fire Department
- Town of Vici for Vici Fire Department
“Around 90 percent of Oklahoma’s fire service is volunteer,” Sanders said. “It is critical that they receive the equipment they need to continue to protect our communities. I plan to continue my support for fire service in the budget again in 2016. It was a legislative initiative that ensured volunteer fire departments received aid in the first place and legislators will continue their support, if not increase it.”
By Rep. Mike Sanders
State lawmakers have begun their legislative studies, which will help shape the policy proposals put forward in 2016. Legislative studies are conducted in House committee rooms, where legislators hear from state agencies, think tanks and policy researchers on ideas for improvements to our laws and state services.
Although I will participate in multiple studies, my primary focus will be organizing a study on addressing DUIs. The October study will include the Oklahoma Highway Patrol, Oklahoma Highway Safety Office, the Oklahoma Department of Transportation and a representative from the Governor’s Impaired Driving Prevention Advisory Council. The issue at hand is what to do about repeat DUI offenders who have not yet been convicted, but are committing multiple violations over the course of a short period. Potential legislation, depending on the feedback we receive from our policy experts, could take many forms, but at least one idea I am considering is linking municipal and state DUI tracking systems to help officers identify repeat offenders. The ultimate goal is to protect Oklahomans from individuals with serious substance abuse problems that are on our roads.
I am also interested in a September study on uninsured motorists. These motorists include illegal immigrants who cannot get insurance, individuals who have little money or individuals who are not legally allowed on the road. When an uninsured motorist injures another motorist or damages personal property, they do not have insurance to help pay for medical treatment and repairs. We have worked to make laws to deter this behavior, but it persists. The study should inform us of the scope of the problem today and present potential solutions.
After creating the open carry law in Oklahoma, there continues to be discussion over how to reduce the costs and increase the convenience of obtaining an open carry license. Another September study will examine the fees and procedure involved in getting an open carry license with the intent of removing some of those barriers.
Many legislators are eagerly anticipating a large budgetary study that will examine areas of spending in the budget known as “pass-throughs.” These pass-throughs often represent non-essential funding that could allow Oklahoma state government to become more efficient. Optimum budgeting requires a lot of information. As your elected officials, our goal is to maximize the value of your tax dollars.
OKLAHOMA CITY (Aug. 6, 2015) -- State Rep. Mike Sanders, of Kingfisher, is one of only three Oklahoma lawmakers to receive a perfect rating for his votes during the recent legislative session on issues related to taxpayer interests.
Sanders earned a grade of 100 percent on the legislative scorecard released by OCPA Impact, a nonpartisan organization that serves as the advocacy partner of the Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs, a free-market think tank.
"Each day, hardworking Oklahomans are facing more and more hurdles placed in front of them by their federal government," Sanders said.
"We have the opportunity and responsibility, then, to make Oklahoma a more welcoming place for families, taxpayers and job creators. This includes applying common sense and accountability to our state government so it doesn't get too big and unaffordable."
OCPA Impact advances legislation at the Oklahoma Capitol to help grow the private-sector economy and jobs climate statewide. The organization is based in Oklahoma City.
The scorecard released in June by the organization looks at how Oklahoma's 149 state legislators voted during the 2015 session on key bills related to issues of economic freedom, free enterprise, individual opportunity, limited state government and encroachment by the federal government.
Bills featured on the scorecard include measures to prevent in Oklahoma what has recently taken place in Denton, Tex., where energy producers and mineral rights owners have been barred from drilling for oil and natural gas.
The scorecard also looks at bills aiming to responsibly reduce Oklahoma's tax burden and spend taxpayer dollars more effectively and efficiently.
In addition, the scorecard lists as a negative vote the general appropriations bill for Oklahoma government's new fiscal year. The bill was part of a budget agreement that will reduce funding for road and bridge maintenance while increasing funding for other government agencies. Sanders, who chairs the House Appropriations & Budget Transportation Subcommittee, voted against the bill.
All totaled, in 22 opportunities during session, Sanders voted each time in the best interests of growth-minded taxpayers, according to the scorecard.
"Some lawmakers go to the Capitol in Oklahoma City and do a good job representing taxpayers in their districts back home, and some have other priorities," said Dave Bond, OCPA Impact's CEO.
"Taxpayers and voters in Northwest Oklahoma should be glad to know Rep. Sanders consistently votes to keep the burden of state government spending and taxes low and to limit the amount of government in our daily lives. His votes reflect an emphasis on sustainable jobs instead of the priorities of government bureaucrats."
For more information about OCPA Impact and to view the full scorecard, including bill summaries, please visit www.ocpaimpact.com/2015-legislative-scorecard.
# # #
By Rep. Mike Sanders
The school year is starting again and I want to take this opportunity to praise the educators for their diligent work on behalf of Oklahoma children. Your hard work ensures young Oklahomans’ ability to thrive in their adult lives.
I use the word educators because there are many players involved in a young person’s education. Their teachers have a direct impact on their progress during their school years. Administrators and support staff help to ensurestudents have an optimal environment for learning. And, of course, study after study has shown the important impact parental involvement has on a child’s scholastic success.
Teacher quality is one of the most significant factors related to student achievement. Unfortunately, in the U.S., 14 percent of new teachers resign by the end of their first year and 50 percent leave by their fifth year. It is a tough job, a fact that is often reinforced to me by my family members who have worked or currently work as teachers. For those of you who have made a long career of educating students, I salute your endurance and strength of character.
Reading is an important key to your child’s ability to learn throughout their school years. Parents can help encourage strong reading habits. Looking online, one of the most frequent suggestions are allowing children to have a period in which they are allowed to read in their room after bedtime. Other suggestions include having a large variety of books at home for your child and reading alongside your child.
Science and math are increasingly the foundational skills for careers in Oklahoma’s most lucrative industries. You can help raise your child’s interest by conducting simple science experiments at home and showing them practical applications for math, such as family budgeting.
In Oklahoma, as in much of the country, public education is a hotly debated area of public policy. Every year, my colleagues introduce proposals to tweak education policy. I personally believe that local school boards should make many of these decisions with the input of parents in the district. For that reason, I restrict my own legislation to other areas of law. Even so, it would be irresponsible for me not to weigh in on those discussions brought forth by other legislators.
I try to navigate tough education policy questions by consulting the parents and educators of my district. For that reason, I want to encourage you to contact me with your concerns and your thoughts. I also want to wish every teacher and administrator good luck on the new school year. I pray that they will have a great and productive year. As always, I can be contacted at (405) 557-7407.
By Rep. Mike Sanders
The Oklahoma Department of Agriculture, Food and Forestry got my attention this summer when they reduced the funding they will provide that benefits rural volunteer fire departments. I knew that they received a cut this year, but I was surprised that they decided to redo their budget in a way that reduces the public safety service provided in rural communities.
Operational funds are provided through the agency for each of the more than 850 certified rural fire department with each receiving equal portions. Prior to 2010, this money was never raided to balance the agency budget. This year, each volunteer rural fire department will lose about $200, on top of raiding that has already occurred in past years. Rural Fire Coordinators provide technical advice and assistance to rural fire departments in communities whose population does not exceed 10,000 residents through the Oklahoma Forestry Service Rural Fire Defense Program. The coordinators are funded through a contract between the agency and the Oklahoma Association of Regional Councils. This program has seen no increase in contract funding since 1999 and has received funding cuts since 2010. This year, they are receiving a 5 percent cut. The 80/20 grants has also been cut down to an estimated $200,000. Two additional programs that helped get surplus equipment to rural firefighters have been eliminated.
I decided not to be rash and to talk to Secretary of Agriculture Jim Reese before I drew any conclusions about the agency’s actions. I understood that the agency budget was going to look different than in past years. The budget shortfall was created from a combination of the slowdown of the oil and gas industry in Oklahoma and longterm budgetary problems, such as the use of one-time revenues in past years and off-the-top obligated monies for higher education, roads and bridges and state retirement systems. With that shortfall, it made sense that they would review their budget and look for ways to save money.
When I met with Secretary Reese, one of the questions I had for him was whether or not any full-time employees were cut under the agency. The reason I asked this was that a common practice among agency administrators is to target a popular program in order to make legislators “feel the pain” of any cut to appropriations. If the agency did a thorough review of its overall spending and cut from multiple areas, I can accept that the cut to rural firefighters was a purely budgetary position. If, however, he cut only that program, while not releasing even a single full-time employee, I will be suspicious that his actions are due to politics.
Secretary Reese’s response to me in person was that he didn’t have that information in front of him but that he would get it to me shortly. Generally, I do not nitpick every agency decision, but I think any reduction to core services such as public safety or road and bridge funding warrant my interest. If the Ag Department is protecting secondary services on the backs of core services, I will be very disappointed.
By Rep. Mike Sanders
I have recently talked with U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, and his staff, who are working to get reauthorization of federal funding for highways. The job of all elected officials is to work together for the common good of their constituents. For that reason, I want to help explain the need for this important federal legislation and for a robust and continuing investment in this country’s infrastructure.
A measure to reauthorize federal funding for six years will soon be on the floor of the U.S. Congress. Through his leadership, it was approved unanimously in Senator Inhofe’s committee in late June. Unlike many federal programs today, highway funding is a core service which benefits all of the public and falls very strongly in line with the constitutional duties of Congress. The U.S. Constitution calls for the federal government to support interstate commerce. Nothing is more central to that goal than our interstate transportation infrastructure.
There are 47,000 miles of interstate and 18 billion tons of freight worth $17 trillion moving across the country annually. A strong, well maintained and efficient local, state and national transportation network is the only publicly accessible infrastructure that can directly impact our quality of life, our economic viability and our very strength as a State and a Nation. Every year, Oklahoma produces more than $6 billion in exports to more than 25 countries. Our goods travel across multiple states to get to ports such as Long Beach, which we use to export to Asia. Eighty percent of the tonnage shipped annually from sites in the state are carried by trucks and another seven percent are carried by courier services or multiple mode deliveries, which include trucking. Highway accessibility consistently ranks among the top site selection factors that drives the decision making of corporate executives. Sound investments in transportation infrastructure add travel and access value and provide a tangible, immediate and easily quantifiable return.
The proposed reauthorization bill provides almost $100 billion in additional funding for the next six years. Lesser amounts over shorter authorization periods constrains our ability to develop our best investment strategy and would force states to give up larger, longer projects. The bill also streamlines the project delivery process to improve the speed at which projects can be started and completed. The bill also specifically targets bridge safety and the interstate system. Finally, it provides for more local control over which projects are priorities.
I have written at length about the need to prioritize infrastructure funding. No doubt, the administrative burden and overreach of the federal government needs to be downsized, but when it comes to road and bridge funding, the opposite is true. Investing in transportation infrastructure is a primary and constitutional responsibility of the federal government that cannot and should not be ignored.
As always, I would love to hear from you. I can be contacted at (405) 557-7407.
OKLAHOMA CITY – State Rep. Mike Sanders today released the following statement in response to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in King v. Burwell:
“It is very disappointing that the Supreme Court has consistently supported the Affordable Care Act despite clear arguments for constitutional flaws in the law and how it is being executed by the federal government. This sets the stage for the Affordable Care Act to be a central issue of contention in the upcoming presidential election. Conservatives like myself will continue to fight to overturn bad policy that can only lead to increased costs and limited access for many Americans.”
OKLAHOMA CITY – State Rep. Mike Sanders (R-Kingfisher) today released the following statement in response to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. Hodges:
“The Supreme Court continues to disappoint those of us that expect rulings that are consistent with our history of law and traditions. Instead they have chosen to legislate from the bench, redefining the legal definition of marriage and giving same-sex couples an elevated status that should be reserved for a marriage between a man and a woman.
“Since the beginning of Western culture, based on biblical teachings, marriage has been defined as between a man and a woman. Western marriage law also followed that teaching, until today. In Oklahoma, we had an overwhelming majority who supported a state ban on same-sex marriage. What right does the federal government have to overturn state policies on almost every front?
By state Rep. Mike Sanders
Recently, a friend of mine traveled to Australia to see the sights down under.
During his travels, he had a conversation with an Aussie and they got to talking about the British Royal Family. They talked about the Queen being on their money and that she is the official Head of State for Australia. Finally, my friend was asked: “So, what’s America’s connection to the Queen?”
Slightly surprised, he answered that America has no official connection to the United Kingdom or British royalty – that we fought a war to earn our freedom and independence from the British crown. That is unique compared to two of Britain’s overseas colonies that eventually became their own countries – Australia and Canada – as they are independent commonwealths that still recognize the Queen as Head of State. In Australia, the Queen is able to preside over the Senate and begin the legislative year. If we had lost that war, I imagine that, in time, we would have gone the way of those two lands and become a nation – but still recognize the Queen as our leader.
If that’s not a clear indication of how unique and special our history is, I don’t know what to tell you. Because of the efforts of this nation’s founding fathers, we have a different situation than our allies down under or in the great white north. Because of their efforts to break free from the British, because of phrases like “Give me liberty or give me death!” we have this independent nation that has become a beacon of freedom across the globe.
And that freedom isn’t free. It has to be fought for, time and again. We’re a war-weary nation at the moment but that’s because there are existential threats to our country and to the Western way of life. We must continue to stand tall in the face of terrorism. My former boss, President George W. Bush, said it best in regards to standing tall against those who threaten liberty and freedom:
“Terrorist attacks can shake the foundations of our biggest buildings, but they cannot touch the foundation of America. These acts shatter steel, but they cannot dent the steel of American resolve.”
And that American resolve has stood strong and tall now for 239 years. And it’s all due to two groups of people – the Founding Fathers that fought so hard to break away from Britain and our military service members, who have fought since then to preserve and protect that freedom with their own lives.
I cannot describe with words how thankful and grateful I am that those people chose to risk their lives for the idea that is America. The idea that a nation can be run by the people, for the people and of the people. The idea that we didn’t need a king to rule over us and tell us how to live our lives. The idea that smaller government was best and more personal liberty was of paramount importance.
I hope everyone enjoys this Independence Day weekend. Have a great time at the lake or your cookout. And take in those fireworks. But also take a moment to be thankful for this country and those who sacrificed for its existence and your freedoms.
By Rep. Mike Sanders
There is ongoing heartburn in Oklahoma over the state’s fiscal policies. Tax cuts, spending decisions, tax credits and even the budgeting process are all continually under scrutiny and criticism.
I find this heartburn to be natural. The state budget is the most important product of the legislative session. Why shouldn’t it receive scrutiny and criticism? In fact this year, I voted against the budget on principle, even though I supported many of its spending priorities. I voted against the budget because the good strides it made were on the back of transportation funding. Like education, I consider infrastructure funding to be a top priority of state government. I think recent flooding has further highlighted how important our county road and bridge funding, which took a hit in this year’s budget, really is.
On taxes, I believe that conservative policies have held up well to the intense pressures around fiscal decisions. Our state has seen economic growth and diversification since conservatives took office. The state does have many fiscal challenges. Our prison system is overburdened. We have a population that suffers from health problems, educational challenges and regular natural disasters. These problems are often equated with conservative policies, but the simple truth is that these problems emerged before our time and will continue to be a headache in future years. The most recent tax cut will not take effect until Jan. 1, 2016. Tax cuts in the past have had a positive effect on revenue because of the broader base of taxes we receive when more businesses open and relocated in our state.
What about tax credits? Tax credits and incentives do eat into our revenue that could be used for state services. On the other hand, they grow industry in our state, which translates to jobs and also taxable revenue growth.
However, in the case of some tax credits, we have seen their usefulness outlived. Such is the case of wind industry incentives, which we are now retiring.
This year, Senate Bill 498 was enacted. It phases out the current property tax exemption for wind power generating facilities. Senate Bill 502 removes a job creation tax credit from wind facilities. The governor said about the two measures: “When these tax credits were originally conceived, they were meant to support a new and groundbreaking form of alternative energy. Today, Oklahoma’s wind industry is among the strongest in the nation and is an integral part of our power grid and our economy. Wind energy is here to stay. It no longer needs the same level of support and encouragement from the state.”
The retirement of these tax credits do not represent an acknowledgement of a failed policy, but simply a product of their own success.
Two other tax credit reforms were approved by the Oklahoma Legislature and signed into law by the governor. House Bill 2182 creates a process to provide legislators with independent data on economic incentives, including estimated fiscal impacts and assessments of whether incentives are achieving their goals. Senate Bill 806 requires that any economic incentive include a measurable goal or goals when enacted.
Two bad fiscal policies enacted this year were the two museum bonds approved. The first one dealt with the American Indian Cultural Center and Museum. Legislative leaders were able to win support for the bill because many legislators felt like it was the only way to get the museum off our hands. As a conservative, I voted against the bill, because I believe core services trump non-essential projects. I also voted against the OKPOPS museum bond. In order to pass this bond, legislative leaders had to pull in support from across the aisle, because they could not get a majority of conservatives to support the measure. The two measures will set up back $50 million in bonds, or several million dollars each year for a decade or two to come.
The budgeting process itself will change slightly this year. Under one measure, agencies will now have to justify their expenses according to a set of goals set forward by your elected officials. We did not enact a reform that would have created a budget-only session. There is still interest in that policy, but there are reservations that we would be blocking important policy work we do each year.
I think our overall fiscal approach is good, but could be improved and could be more conservative. I and other like-minded legislators will continue to push for core services over non-essential spending and pro-growth tax policies.
This interim, I will be in the district as I always am. I look forward to your thoughts, concerns and suggestions. Have a wonderful summer and thank you for all that you do for our district and state.